|
Global Strategic Planning Meeting on Teacher Training in Human Rights Education June 2005 - New York, U.S.A. | other working sessions |
| |
who
|
goal
|
agenda
|
evaluations
|
blog
regional surveys and reports | outcomes | other documents |
| Canada - Teacher Training Survey | ||
by Vincenza
Narrazi, Canadian Human Rights Foundation
&
Shirley Sarna, Commission des droits de la personne et des droits droits
de la jeunesse du Québec
1. What are the structures or institutions available in your country to conduct (a) pre-service teacher training and (b) in-service teacher training/professional development?
a) Faculties of Education (50 in all) in Universities in 10 provinces and territories (See OISE website for details http://leo.oise.utoronto.ca -
b) Pedagogical days (about 20 per school year). Professional training provision to have a replacement at the expense of the board (paid leave for the teacher and substitute teacher paid. Professional development is encouraged. Opportunities to return school for a year is also a provision in the teachers' contract.
2. Which institutions are responsible for ensuring the quality and effectiveness in your country in (a) pre-service teacher training and (b) in-service teacher training/professional development?
a) University Faculties of Education (Independent Commission set up by government to study education system in Quebec - Monseigneur Parent Commission - 1960 law came into force setting up the Ministry of Education
b) Schools and School Board s (agreements with Quebec Human Rights Commission, broader community of stakeholders in medical profession and law enforcement for specific training)
3. Which institutions are responsible for policies in your country/region of (a) pre-service teacher training and (b) in-service teacher training/professional development?
Ministries of Education in each province
4. What studies or evaluations have been completed in your country/region for (a) pre-service teacher training and (b) in-service teacher training/ professional development?
5. What effective practices exist in your country/region for (a) pre- service teacher training and (b) in-service teacher training/ professional development?
a ) The program for teacher training was increased by 1 year (from a 3-year University program after 2 years of college to a 4-year university program), more praticuum added from 1 year to 2 years
b) in hands of school board and individual schools ; Teachers can suggest they need training in certain subject areas
6. What ways have institutions in your country/region used to monitor, be accountable and/or measure effectiveness of (a) pre-service teacher training and (b) in-service teacher training/ professional development?
a) Teachers are evaluated by supervising teachers (class you take over when you do your student teaching- practicuum ) b) once in service, the school principal evaluates teachers' performance through classroom observation. However, principals have less and less time given the extra administrative workload
7. What strengths exist in your country/region for including human rights education into (a) pre-service teacher training and (b) in- service teacher training/ professional development?
a) Multiculturalism course is part of the teacher training program in Montreal - e.g., McGill University , in Toronto OISE -) other urban Centers? b) In Quebec the curriculum reform has included human rights related competencies in the new program. The Education Act for Quebec included an article under Teacher Obligations which states: 22.3 A teacher shall take the appropriate means to foster respect for human rights in his students
Provincial Human Rights commissions have a mandate to provide HRE in schools, but it has to be at the request of the schools. In Quebec, again, content of the English language arts program is let to the discretion of the School Boards and individual schools. Ministry sets general objectives. Teachers have used this program to talk about racial discrimination and other rights related issues.
8. What weaknesses exist in your country/region for (a) pre-service teacher training and (b) in-service teacher training/ professional development?
a) No national policy - every province can set its own standards. little or no human rights training for teachers b) not enough time - e.g., only one person goes on training for human rights - no time to share learning and implement training - The principal is the team leader and he/she makes decisions about training.
9. What opportunities are there in your country/region for human rights education in (a) pre-service teacher training and (b) in-service teacher training/ professional development?
a) Universities are open however resources are lacking b) personal contacts with the schools, governing boards parents/community rep representatives
10. What are threats/obstacles exist in your country/region for human rights education in (a) pre-service teacher training and (b) in- service teacher training/ professional development?
a) lack of knowledge, hesitance to change , conservative institutions b) demotivated workforce , average age 50 , wanting to retire but not retiring